• scott@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Or you could fire your boss and form a worker cooperative run on consensus based decision making. Worker cooperatives succeed more than “traditional” businesses and have higher pay for their workers[1], despite being at a systemic disadvantage for seed capital. You don’t need an ai to boss you around, you and your coworkers can make collective decisions without any boss to speak of.


    1. https://www.thenews.coop/worker-co-op-sector-continues-to-grow-in-the-usa/ ↩︎

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I’ve often thought that worker cooperative call centres should be a thing. The people who manage call centres barely understand the contract because inevitably they higher management from outside of the company, since no one on the phones could possibly be management material.

      It would probably make quite a lot of money because one of the biggest complaints that companies have about their third party call centres is inefficiencies. Even if the bosses wanted to fix the inefficiencies they can’t because they don’t understand the contract at a base enough level. In a workers cooperative that wouldn’t be an issue since the workers would understand the contract.

      Unfortunately it probably would face the issue that all new starts in the industry make, in that most businesses are locked into multi-year contracts with their call centre providers and can’t just swap to a new provider whenever they want. So you’d have to time its startup very precisely as a big company came to the end of its contract, or you’d probably have to get some clients on board before you even started.

      • AHamSandwich@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        This is a very good idea. I worked call centers in the US when I was younger and they all suffered from terrible, abusive management.

  • Voytrekk@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    It would be the largest cost cutting measure, but the ruling class won’t allow it.

  • ssillyssadass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I actually think an AI would do a better job at running corporations than a human would. Even if it’s just an LLM. And I don’t mean in a pro-corpo way.

    • Wolf@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      My cousin was fired from his job. The manager told him that AI had determined that he was to be fired, and that it was out of his hands. Either that was a true statement or it was a convenient excuse. Kind of scary either way.

    • sheogorath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I have this sneaking suspicion that the company I work for is already ran by an LLM. The CEO is obviously using ChatGPT for everything.

  • MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is what I told my bosses when AI first showed up and they called a meeting to discussed how to leverage it.

    It’s not going to replace me, it’s going to replace you.