This seems like a waste of time to me when you could instead focus on Coal or things that matter

  • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The light that powers that sign likely uses more power than is going to be saved by people turning their screens off because of it

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        one viral AI avatar or “Barbie Box” image can consume enough energy to fully charge an electric car several times.

        A Model 3 battery is 200,000-300,000 kiloJoules.

        Absolute worst case for an image, even taking very extreme estimates and amortizing out all the training, is like 30 kJ. Maybe 70 kJ for a slop video that takes under a minute to render, which is on the order of browsing Lemmy on a laptop for a bit. For reference, a local generation with FLUX dev on my 3090 is 2 kJ per image, and that’s relatively inefficient.

        I’m just saying, that is a bad comparison, as EVs take an absolute truckload of electricity to run.

      • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I don’t think anybody turns their phones on thinking “I wonder what halfbaked AI generated video i can watch now?”