• ZeroOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I still find the name weird. Let’s do something fun here; Comment what YOU think ForgeJo should be called instead

  • 3dcadminA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I’d have a read but I’m in the UK…

    • Javi@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      You sure that the issue is geographical? I’m in the UK and was able to access the site without using a VPN or anything like that.

    • toph@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Probably just the weird name. It makes it feel like someone’s weekend personal project.

      I use it to self-host my own code and it works great, I’m totally moved off GitHub now.

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Yeah, this is news to me. I think Codeberg runs on Forgejo, and just the other day people were singing its praises when GitHub became part of Microsoft’s AI team. This feels like a sudden shift.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        46 minutes ago

        Another git repository is hosted not on itself?
        Seems like a weird choice.

        That’s like the CEO from Microsoft going on stage with a MacBook.

        • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 minutes ago

          Codeberg is a service. Forgejo is a platform.

          It’s more like how a warehouse company doesn’t build its own forklifts.

    • Sips'@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Personally uaong forgejo myself and it has been smooth sailing for ages! This is the first time ive ever seen people taking a stance against it, though the ones in the comments sidnt seem to have a good argument.

    • miridius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      You’re the asshole for expecting an open source project to have to spend all their time supporting every possible niche browser/configuration, rather than spending time building their actual product that people want to use.

    • mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Yeah same, I’m on Brave and Anubis is blocking me. Not hating on them for using Anubis though. It is unfortunate that it’s blocking me nonetheless.

      (Inb4 I am told to commit sudoku for using Brave, yes I know the owner sucks)

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        45 minutes ago

        If you know, why still use it?
        Not like theres a bazillion other chrome browsers and you could probably use any other browser (depending on the add-ons you really need)

    • MHLoppy@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Can access fine (with reduced functionality) on my end with JS disabled - maybe you have something else tripping it up or something?

        • techwithjake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Seems like something else tripping it up. Just tested with DDG Browser from F-Droid. Passed the bot test, no issues. Did have to reload the page once for it to render properly though. After that, worked just fine. Aggressive DNS ad blocker, maybe?

          • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 hours ago

            My bad, I should have read the error better (although I could have sworn it was complaining about javascript before, I probably misremember): The actual error is

            Missing feature Cookies

            Still, that is on default settings…