• 0 Posts
  • 84 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 24th, 2023

help-circle
  • Probably a good thing that will benefit us.

    The problem is, like with most things this government seems to be doing, we won’t feel the benefit for a long time. People are impatient and they want results now.

    Whether that’s reasonable or not doesn’t matter. It’s the reality, it affects polling, and will affect the next general election.

    Things like this, the planning reforms, the infrastructure spending they’re doing, SureStart 2.0, NHS improvements, green subsidies, etc won’t start to bear fruit until Reform are in, and they’ll benefit from it, only to then tear it all down so the next government inherits the same poisoned chalice this government did last year.







  • I used to maintain a website for a bicycling club in my county that was great for getting people into biking, getting people out the house, making friends, and staying fit.

    We had a banner ad along the top of the site for a local bicycle/bicycle repair shop that aided the club a lot and was very reasonable.

    He got something out of it (publicity and a seal of approval towards the value/quality of his work), and we got something out of it (money to run the site, and a bit left over for things like puncture repair kits and the occasional celebratory drink after an arduous ride).

    Nobody bats an eyelid to those ads. They are reasonable.

    What we have now isn’t that. What we have now is an insecure, malware-infested privacy nightmare that ruins webpages and stresses everybody out.

    Use Firefox + uBlock origin for your own sanity. Don’t let big tech make you feel guilty for not going along with their game.


  • We saw how politically unviable it was to take away WFA from those who had money while still preserving it for people who don’t.

    Labour completely collapsed in the polls overnight, and have paid an extremely heavy price for it, with the biggest reason stated for the polling drop and sub-par local election results being the WFA changes. There’s a good chance that removing Doris’ wine fund like that has enabled a Reform 2030 government.

    Now imagine scrapping triple-lock.

    It simply will not happen. Anybody who says they do it won’t be elected, and anybody who does it without it in their manifesto won’t be elected again.

    Not that Labour could pass it even if the leadership wanted to weather that storm. There would be a backbencher revolt the likes of which we’ve never seen before. MPs wouldn’t back something they know will get them ousted.

    Sadly it seems the only thing that will put an end to the insanity of triple lock is terms pending a bailout from the IMF.







  • Possibly related to them having a donate to Palestine Action button on their website, although they say they removed that after proscription of PA.

    Perhaps their account was automatically flagged because of the previous transaction, or something transactions went through after the proscription. I wouldn’t be surprised if the bank was afraid of legal repercussions on their end if they acted as a middle man in funding a proscribed terrorist group.

    Regardless, the bank not giving a clear and concrete reason why the funds are frozen is frustrating, and IMO not right. How hard would it have been to say “This account has been flagged as financially supporting Palestine Action. Funds are temporarily frozen pending investigation.” I hate lack of transparency.

    E: people want a lack of transparency from banks, I guess?





  • You’ll never guess what the ‘L’ in LGBT stands for…

    It stands for Lesbian. What is your point?

    I’m not the one going against the LGBT community, she is.

    I don’t see how you can come to that conclusion given the article.

    Did you read it?

    Again, I don’t see how you can come to that conclusion about her goals.

    ??? She doesn’t think Trans people, a part of the LGBT community, exist.

    Again, this is jumping to conclusions.

    It really isn’t.

    True but that doesn’t mean any particular person who is critical of one section of the community is necessarily against the whole community, that doesn’t follow.

    It absolutely follows. If you are against Trans people, you are against LGBT.

    Firstly wow that took no time at all https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin’s_law

    I’m well aware of what Godwin’s law is. What’s your point, exactly? It’s relevant.

    Do you deny that there were Jews in Germany who hated the Jewish community? Yes or no?


  • You’ll never guess what the ‘T’ in LGBT stands for…

    This person is absolutely standing against the LGBT community. She is actively seeking to drive a wedge between LGBT communities and the police, making the entire community less safe in the process, as well as trying to divide people in regards to LGBT issues.

    She will happily cut off her nose to spite her face, if it means harming trans people.

    And being part of a community doesn’t make you immune from being against the community. There’s plenty of anti-immigration immigrants, there’s homophobic/transphobic/biphobic people in the LGBT community, there were people from colonies who saw their own colonies as barbaric and welcomed white masters, there were Jews in Germany who hated Jews and happily supported Nazis, there are working class people who are disdainful of working class culture.