• Matriks404@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    34 minutes ago

    The thing with age verification is that I don’t think it’s a bad thing if done securely, but still it still makes me sad, because Internet will never be the same with it. In the end it will be only few big websites who can afford to care about Internet regulation.

    Well, after all maybe it’s time to switch to Gemini protocol, they are not going to regulate that!

  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    9 hours ago

    If they roll this out to my country, I’m just not buying any of their games. My privacy is worth a lot more than that.

    I might still play them, I just won’t buy them, because I’m not doing age verification.

  • Yggstyle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Maybe I’m dating myself but this is the same company that released state of emergency for the PS2? That game you could literally mow down people in a mall with a mini gun?

    They were worried about “the children?” News to me.

    • slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      48 minutes ago

      I mean the whole “ban gta” movement was started by rockstar themselves. They riled up the masses about how dangerous gta is, and it worked. The moms hopped onto the train and the whole movement gained momentum and the made billions.

  • AlphaOmega@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Can you even call it GTA online if there aren’t a dozen 12 year olds running around screaming, “N***** and F*****”.

    • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The point is to make children used to checks.

      It’s a didactic law.

      IRL usually children grow up feeling they are free (except for their parents) to an extent.

      This is intended so that identifying yourself in the Internet were normal by the time you grow up for it to matter.

      But, of course, there might be some good considerations, if you’re into playing devil’s advocate. People might remember which stupid shit they were posting when they were younger, and want for future generations to be always conscious of the difference between pseudonymity and anonymity, and superficial anonymity vs real. People might want to make it so that nobody had a false sense of security, leading to really bad mistakes. People might want this to be the step preceding some way to fight bots.

      And they might even not have good considerations, but eventually realize that the oppressive system they are building is best rebuilt for something better and used differently. Wouldn’t be the first time in history.

      It’s just that laying down your arms in hopes for that is unwise.

    • themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      This falls on the parents instead because of dumb laws every one has to deal with this, I just hope that not all countries are this insane:

      users in the UK have had to take photos of themselves and upload it to a service that uses AI to guess their age. Or, send in photos of ID such as passports or driving licenses.

        • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Year 2025 - politicians are held under control by evidence of them having raped children

          Year 2035 - politicians are held under control by evidence of them having made children outside of the state incubator

  • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    130
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    GTA online is the worst thing to happen to the series, since it killed off story DLCs. Which were a fantastic way to get new story based content for their games between the years long wait between sequels. Damn those gamers and their obsession with buying microtransactions.

    • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Unfortunately, the online component easily becomes a profitable sideline. Sarcastically, it’s what keeps some game corporation CEOs afford their lifestyles.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Then they double killed it when they started introducing nonsense like flying cars with rocket launchers.

    • TheMonk@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I don’t understand why people needed to give them constant money. For real, I played for a minute but never spent a dime. Why buy things when you can achieve them?

      • binarytobis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 hours ago

        To be honest I regret spending so much time earning money and buying so many cars. It would have been more fun riding around in a stolen piece of trash robbing liquor stores with a friend than grinding the bank heist over and over.

      • SuperSpecialNickname@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Because it’s extremely annoying to earn enough money. Payouts are pathetic and things are extremely expensive to push you towards buying money. I didn’t spend any money on it thankfully, that’s just my reasoning behind it.

        • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          13 hours ago

          People are really weird. Stuff like that makes me not play, but for most it makes them spend. I find those consumers bizarre as hell, but they are the mainstream consumer so we are the weird ones.

          • TheMonk@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            12 hours ago

            This is definitely the way I feel. Even if I really want to do something, if I find out they’re doing this to squeeze me or they’re putting some wild shit in the privacy policy, I just don’t engage with their shit. Fuck those companies. I’m more angry with capitalism than I am susceptible to the desire they try to garner

        • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          It was great the first couple years when people were just throwing piles of in game money around so everyone could play with all the flashy things. After they cinched up every money glitch and started pushing shark cards…online instantly lost any appeal. As you said, grinding for things in game is purposefully tedious and geared to make you spend more money.

    • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      22 hours ago

      On the flip side, it’s given it insane longevity and made it feel more modern. Playing singleplayer feels so annoying at times because of their arbitrary rules (which are still in online, but toned down a little) and gameplay/mission design.

      At least GTAO showed everyone rockstar’s true nature, and you couldn’t turn away or say that it’s a small alternative game mode.
      So shoutout to online and 5 as a whole for showing me enough to avoid all future rockstar titles lol

      • tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        17 hours ago

        GTA5 was released in 2013. GTA6 is being released 13 years later. If there had been no GTAO, we would have had at least one or two more “modern” GTA releases in that window.

        • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I wouldn’t be so sure. Modern AAA games are insanely big and resource-intensive. Just look at rdr2

          • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            13 hours ago

            We would have had story DLC like Ballad of Gay Tony and the Lost and the Damned GTA IV got as well as Undead Nightmare for Red Dead Redemption.

    • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Seriously. Our school had a presentation by a guy about kids and computer usage. The gist of it was: Roblox bad, because of paedophiles. GTA good, because it furthers role playing. Basically the opposite of the age recommendations.

    • BeliefPropagator@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      maybe the goal is instead to try to get ahead of regulation by implementing a system that is easily bypassed by most kids (like these video based age estimations). Then they can show this to the regulator and be like: “look were already doing everything we can, no need to actually put the regulation in place”.

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      You might not be able to connect to FiveM servers, which IMO is a major loss. FiveM is the real GTA V.

  • HeyJoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Phew, ok good. A few months ago, when this first leaked, it made it seem like this was going to be used for every country and for the entire game. I have never played GTA online and never will.

    The internet is continuing to get worse and worse… also, those comments on the actual article were strangely to pro.