• Blueberrydreamer@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    5 days ago

    It’s more like ‘not commit their life to one person.’ Jedi are encouraged to love, but forbidden to prioritize an individual over the greater good.

      • Blueberrydreamer@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        I would argue that Eros is perfectly fine with the Jedi. In the novels and comics, Jedi have sexual relationships all the damn time. Padawans regularly have trists with other padawans, Jedi have one night stands, all kinds of stuff without fear of being expelled from the order.

        I don’t think there’s a clean way to apply the Greek loves here really. It’s more like they’re forbidden from going too deep into philia? Ultimately ‘Attachment’ is not a kind of love, it’s a fear, and fear is the enemy of all Jedi. If you can love someone without being afraid to lose them, then there’s no issue, but that’s obviously an incredibly difficult concept. That’s why it’s easier to just keep some level of detachment from others.

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          No, there’s not a “clean” way, I agree. There’s not a specific “romantic” category in there, but I would say that romantic love would be between eros and philia. And they’re allowed either one of those, but both combined would lead to devotion towards one person instead of the institution / greater good.

          But I would agree that sexual lust would be closer to eros and that that would technically be fine for a Jedi, as long as it’s not infatuation.

          Basically, Jedi rules is hooker rules; fuckings fine, but no kissing on the mouth.