Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to United Kingdom@feddit.ukEnglish · 2 days agoTwo men behind ‘senseless’ felling of Sycamore Gap tree jailed for more than four yearswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square48linkfedilinkarrow-up1106arrow-down11
arrow-up1105arrow-down1external-linkTwo men behind ‘senseless’ felling of Sycamore Gap tree jailed for more than four yearswww.theguardian.comDavriellelouna@lemmy.world to United Kingdom@feddit.ukEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square48linkfedilink
minus-squareneonred@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down8·2 days agoDefinitely not harsh enough. They should have gotten AT LEAST 12 years each. And even that could never make up the damage they have done. 12 is too mild, 4 entirely laughable.
minus-squareBerstrrs@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·6 hours agoFor what? All they done is… Cut a tree. Think about it for a sec. Just a tree. Tree surgeons do this on a daily basis
minus-squareneonred@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·2 days agoOf course this is nonwithstanding other environmental crimes should be prosecuted, just as hard.
minus-squarebungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down4·1 day agoYou obviously don’t know what you’re talking about
minus-squareTheGrandNagus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-211 hours agoYou obviously don’t. You were advocating for practically zero punishment for it, and find incessant lying in court to be completely fine too. I’m immensely glad you’re not involved in the justice system or legislation. What a fucking disaster that would be. A criminal free-for-all.
minus-squarebungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·8 hours agoI wasn’t advocating for zero punishment. But what damage has been done that justifies 4 years prison, let alone 12?
minus-squareIlovethebomb@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 hours agoIntentionally destroying a national landmark, that’s what. And it seems to be done purely for the sake of it. Your comments on this don’t reflect well on your intelligence, I must say.
minus-squarebungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·5 hours agoI forgive you too, brother
Definitely not harsh enough. They should have gotten AT LEAST 12 years each. And even that could never make up the damage they have done. 12 is too mild, 4 entirely laughable.
For what?
All they done is… Cut a tree.
Think about it for a sec. Just a tree.
Tree surgeons do this on a daily basis
Of course this is nonwithstanding other environmental crimes should be prosecuted, just as hard.
You obviously don’t know what you’re talking about
You obviously don’t. You were advocating for practically zero punishment for it, and find incessant lying in court to be completely fine too.
I’m immensely glad you’re not involved in the justice system or legislation. What a fucking disaster that would be. A criminal free-for-all.
I wasn’t advocating for zero punishment. But what damage has been done that justifies 4 years prison, let alone 12?
Intentionally destroying a national landmark, that’s what. And it seems to be done purely for the sake of it.
Your comments on this don’t reflect well on your intelligence, I must say.
I forgive you too, brother
deleted by creator