• 1 Post
  • 16 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2023

help-circle

  • Okay, if Proxmox can handle all that, I’ll be glad to ditch TrueNAS. However, I’m afraid that I won’t know how to migrate. I’ve found this reddit thread about someone who tried to do the same thing (I think) and accidentally corrupted their pools. About skipping NFS shares, that would be a big improvement for me, but I’m very unfamiliar with bind mounts. If I understand correctly, you can specify directories that live on the Proxmox Host, and they appear inside the VM, right? How does this compare to using virtual storage? Also, how can I replicate the ZFS pools to an external machine? In any case, thank you for that info!





  • I tried OMV in the past, but I found TrueNAS to be more intuitive… but that’s just personal preference I guess, and I’m not opposed to using OMV. Are you suggesting, then, that I run OMV on bare metal, and use it for everything? Or should it be inside a VM? If it’s the former, how easy is it to setup docker, because I’m not that familiar with OMV (it’s been a long time since I last checked it out). Is it like installing it in Debian directly? How does it handle the storage?


  • Wait, so if I understood correctly, you’re managing the ZFS pools directly in Proxmox, and then you have a VM that’s running docker, and using the storage that is managed by Proxmox, right? Hmm, sounds like a good solution. Is there any documentation or article that you could recommend, so that I can take a closer look? Also, how could I handle SMB shares?


  • The problem is that I’ve never worked with Kubernetes, and it wouldn’t allow me to port over my current docker instances, afaik. And I’m not ready to pay for Unraid, I’m sorry, I need to set up the server as frugally as possible. Still, thank you for the info, I’ll keep it in mind, while I decide how to move forward.


  • Yes, that’s why I’ve posted this question, and I immediately powered the entire NAS off, as to avoid any damage. It’s currently still powered off, until I find the best way to move forward. What I’m afraid of is that if I try to import the pools that were managed by the TrueNAS VM into a bare metal TrueNAS install, or Proxmox, that it won’t work correctly, or that I could lose data.





  • Thank you, that’s actually very helpful, because I’m also kinda concerned that the HBA (or SATA to PCIE card) solution won’t fix this issue entirely, and it’s also relatively old system, and I’m worried about compatibility. Having two machines though is also kind of out of the question, because I don’t want to use that much electricity, it’s pretty expensive here where I live. I do have a Raspberry Pi, which could be used for some selfhosted services, but not the demanding ones, and not running alongside each other. I mean, my current PC sometimes struggles already, so I guess the Raspberry Pi will perform even worse… Maybe I can find a solution that allows to still manage storage reliably and flexibly, and also be able to have docker containers.




  • I passed the whole raw disk in theory, but I’ve read that even if you do that, it’s still virtualized somehow. But I don’t know enough about it, I’m just basing this on the research I’ve done so far. About skipping TrueNAS, maybe you’re right, but if I also want to set up SMB shares? Is there a tool or something that makes it easy for someone with limited experience? It would also need to handle replication of data, and the advantage of ZFS Replication over using something like rsync, is that you can simply push the delta between snapshots, instead of replacing entire files, or at least that’s how I’ve understood this.