• Cosmoooooooo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    Try banning the rest of the pitbull breeds.

    They banned one of four major pitbull variations, they just went out and got antoehr pitbull breed.

    Breed legislation does work, but not with loopholes. Ban the rest of the most dangerous dogs, with the worst bite, that also has the most dog-on-dog attacks, dog-on-horse attacks, and dog-on-cattle attacks.

    • Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Sees evidence it doesn’t work, *let’s do it more".

      They’ll just buy rottweilers, or create a new breed. Ban those, they’ll create more new breeds. Ban all dogs so there’s no “loopholes”, they’ll raise goats or something. Ban all pets man, they might be working on an R.O.U.S., I don’t want to be attacked by an R.O.U.S.

      Breed bans don’t work, you have yet more evidence it doesn’t work (this isn’t the only breed ban, it didn’t work in the past, it hasn’t worked in the present). It’s weird to assert it’ll work in the future. Instead address the actual problem why do people want and train animals to attack people.

      If they banned one of four of the dangerous dog breedsz why aren’t dog attacks down by 25%? Unless the problem isn’t the dogs, but the people that abuse then.