• some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Yeah, they’re statistical word generators. There’s no intelligence. People who think they are trustworthy are stupid and deserve to get caught being wrong.

    • AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 minutes ago

      Emotion > Facts. Most people have been trained to blindly accept things and cheer on what fits with their agenda. Like technbro’s exaggerating LLMs, or people like you misrepresenting LLMs as mere statistical word generators without intelligence. That’s like saying a computer is just wires and switches, or missing the forest for the trees. Both is equally false.

      Yet if it fits with the emotional needs or with dogma, then other will agree. It’s a convenient and comforting “A vs B” worldview we’ve been trained to accept. And so the satisfying notion and misinformation keeps spreading.

      LLMs tell us more about human intelligence and the human slop we’ve been generating. It tells us that most people are not that much more than statistical word generators.

    • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Ok what about tech journalists who produced articles with those misunderstandings. Surely they know better yet still produce articles like this. But also people who care enough about this topic to post these articles usually I assume know better yet still spread this crap