ardi60@reddthat.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 天前Google's shocking developer decree struggles to justify the urgent threat to F-Droidwww.neowin.netexternal-linkmessage-square309linkfedilinkarrow-up11.23Karrow-down17
arrow-up11.22Karrow-down1external-linkGoogle's shocking developer decree struggles to justify the urgent threat to F-Droidwww.neowin.netardi60@reddthat.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 天前message-square309linkfedilink
minus-squareFreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·3 天前They’re not removing a feature though, so that whole argument falls over instantly.
minus-squarekadu@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-22 天前deleted by creator
minus-squareFreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-22 天前That’s not removing a feature though, it’s just changing it. Side loading is the feature.
minus-squareFreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 天前I very much doubt that’s how the law works lol
minus-squareFreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 天前Because you’re wrong.
minus-squareFreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·1 天前It’s cute that you think that simply changing a feature is illegal lol
They’re not removing a feature though, so that whole argument falls over instantly.
deleted by creator
That’s not removing a feature though, it’s just changing it. Side loading is the feature.
deleted by creator
I very much doubt that’s how the law works lol
deleted by creator
Because you’re wrong.
deleted by creator
It’s cute that you think that simply changing a feature is illegal lol