“Instead of catching real criminals and terrorists, we are arresting pensioners and disabled people calling for the saving of children’s lives,” said one Metropolitan Police officer.

    • Leraje@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Everyone knows what they did. That’s not the issue that people have. The issue is proscribing them as a terrorist group when they quite clearly aren’t a terrorist group in a monumental trivialisation of what terrorism actually is and an obvious attempt to silence people.

    • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      I think plenty of their supporters knew what they did and frankly they absolutely deserve to be punished for criminal damage. Proscribing them as a terror organisation, however, is waaaay disproportionate and in my personal opinion an abuse of the law. I think their supporters feel the same and are making a stand against this.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 days ago

      Palestine Action was banned after they breached into a military base and damaged RAF jets

      Yes everyone knows that.

      A lot of their supporters are good people that simply aren’t aware of what the group did.

      No that is incorrect, what you are trying to do is make it look legitimate for them to be prescribed. I don’t know of anyone who both supports them but also doesn’t know what they were accused of.

    • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 days ago

      Not only do the vaste majority know what they did. They know Starmer as a lawyer successfully defended very similar actions under the Blair administration. As not criminal due to intent to save lives.

      The level of hypocrisy within the current government is beyond belief. Starmer is clearly the puppet of someone. What or who is the only thing up for debate.

      • MartianSands@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        6 days ago

        Throwing paint into a jet engine really is damage. You gave to take the engine apart and meticulously clean out the paint before you can run it again, because otherwise the engine could do itself serious harm next time it’s started. That’s a very expensive thing to do.

        That actually makes it a very effective act of protest, which is why the government has come down so hard on them

      • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 days ago

        That’s something that would cost thousands to fix if done to a car, as the paint needs to be sanded back and repainted. On an aircraft, it could easily be a six figure job, in addition to a multimillion dollar aircraft being unable to be flown.

        Calling it terrorism is silly, but it’s absolutely damage.

    • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      The public must be so terrorised in their homes, knowing the orphan crushing machines can’t come and save them when they need snap-orphan crushing.