Some key insights from the article:

Basically, what they did was to look at how much batteries would be needed in a given area to provide constant power supply at least 97% of the time, and the calculate the costs of that solar+battery setup compared to coal and nuclear.

  • Tabula_stercore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    they looked at 20 years which is close to the life cycle for solar/batteries and not even half the life of nuclear

    Brother, with some luck a nuclear plant is in construction stage after those 20 years

    • BussyCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      China has been doing them in around 7 years from groundbreaking to grid connection and is trying to get that down to 5 years with their bailong power plant as they are developing an experienced work force and actually have experience making the parts