Some key insights from the article:

Basically, what they did was to look at how much batteries would be needed in a given area to provide constant power supply at least 97% of the time, and the calculate the costs of that solar+battery setup compared to coal and nuclear.

  • 0x0@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Nuclear is just really, really expensive.

    Subsidize it like you do oil, there, solved.