Some key insights from the article:

Basically, what they did was to look at how much batteries would be needed in a given area to provide constant power supply at least 97% of the time, and the calculate the costs of that solar+battery setup compared to coal and nuclear.

  • rollerbang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ve got solar with net metering. But apparently I leave in a much gentler environment still, compared to you. Got a small house (<150sqm), winters reach -20°C and have sustained -10°C for multiple weeks and yet the bill hasn’t reached past 1400€/mo before solar panels. Everything in the house is runs on electricity.

    • a4ng3l@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      With 2 electric cars… Belgium here so it’s not the tundra either but the house is sizeable and doesn’t share walls. Hot water alone was 150/200 kWh a month. It all adds…

      • rollerbang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Still a lot. I have to say my cost was before the “recent” hikes. Though my house doesn’t share walls either.