• NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    If data has handling requirements it 500% should not be something people are storing on their “personal” devices.

    I personally hate the idea of storing corporate data in “cloud” storage, but MS et al have gotten approval from many governments to do exactly that. So if that is your corporate data store? Then that is where it goes. And if someone is making a new document with additional restrictions then they better damned well have training on how to pick which folder in onedrive it goes into.

    • modular950@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      an alternative to MS (or some other third-party) cloud doesn’t have to be “personal” devices, though. company-specific handling requirements can still be achieved via self-hosted network shares containing all user-saved data, which still aids in the local storage replacement issue that you’re having. but for many companies and spaces, MS cloud or whatever third-party could be just fine, and this will of course push some of those folks that direction nicely