I’m genuinely interested in people thoughts about the Fediverse because here in the UK it has massively stalled in 2025, like a lot of things. I am seeing way less posts from UK people and way less interaction and general use in fact. Most seem to have stopped social media use to be fair, and I know a lot of that is to do with my age (old fart here, 56 laps round sun and counting) but the numbers game look poor from my point of view. Do we think the Fediverse has a future now after useage appears to be going downwards? Is it a UK thing? (well I know the UK is weird but hey)

  • Skavau@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Sorry, I’m thinking strictly in terms of Reddit vs. Lemmy/Piefed/adjacent networks because they are essentially Reddit alternatives that function the same. I don’t really know much about Mastodon or other alternative networks, nor can I speak on their health - but the lemmyverse (including new piefed instances) seem to be fine overall.

    This is a strawman: I’m saying “We should not have to rely on open registration instances and hope that the admins get enough funds to keep going”, which is not the same as “all instances should be paywalled”.

    If Piefed (or Lemmy) brings in effective community migration where an entire community can be lifted from one instance to another, then I am not bothered by future lemm.ee scenarios happening. Communities can become nomadic, and that’s fine.

    Again, it’s not just about reddit. Also, it’s about having places where politics are not such a proeminent part of the discussion. E.g, Threads got a lot of their initial momentum by avoiding politics and getting sports journalists to post about NBA and football.

    That’s on people needing to do that. You don’t need to convince me of that. I’m doing it with music and TV. People have to be the change they want to see. But there’s not really anything anyone can do about that with regards to how the audience here interact, or how much interest they have in things outside of politics.

    • rglullis@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Sorry, I’m thinking strictly in terms of Reddit vs. Lemmy/Piefed/adjacent networks because they are essentially Reddit alternatives that function the same. I don’t really know much about Mastodon or other alternative networks, nor can I speak on their health - but the lemmyverse (including new piefed instances) seem to be fine overall.

      From Evan, co-author of ActivityPub: The Fediverse should be more like the Facebook Platform (lots of client apps using the same social graph) rather than the Apple App Store (a bunch of one-feature apps that have to bootstrap their own social network each time).

      Instead of thinking “Lemmy/Piefed vs Reddit” or “Mastodon vs Bluesky vs Twitter” or “PeerTube vs Youtube”, think that the Fediverse can be so much more than a poor man’s version of the proprietary networks. This mentality is still rooted in the silos created by Big Tech.

      Communities can become nomadic, and that’s fine.

      First, I think that community migration implementation from PieFed has very bad implications. It is literally rewriting history.

      Second, if we want to make the Fediverse something really accessible, it needs to be a lot more reliable. Yeah, when we are a few thousand people it’s easy to coordinate the migration of a few dozen communities. But if we are talking about millions or billions of people, we can not afford to have constant failures. People have expectations set by the corporate networks, so the whole system needs to be as reliable as them.

      • Skavau@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        24 hours ago

        First, I think that community migration implementation from PieFed has very bad implications. It is literally rewriting history.

        I don’t really care about that. If the idea of communities being effectively modular becomes an accepted standard, then no-one will blink an eye at their posts on a prior community being redirected after the fact to another instance.

        Second, if we want to make the Fediverse something really accessible, it needs to be a lot more reliable. Yeah, when we are a few thousand people it’s easy to coordinate the migration of a few dozen communities. But if we are talking about millions or billions of people, we can not afford to have constant failures.

        We don’t have constant failures though? What are you referring to here? Lemm.ee crashed out due to owner/admins burnout. That’s the only major one i can think of.

        • rglullis@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          I don’t really care about that.

          I do. I care very much about identity and authenticity in the Fediverse. A server that can take posts done in one group and publish as their own is as unreliable as a server who puts fake posts impersonating a popular user.

          One of the fundamental issues with the current implementations in the Fediverse is that the server owns the keys and can do anything on behalf of the user.

          That’s the only major one i can think of.

          again, why you are talking about Lemmy only? Mastodon instances from all sizes go down every other week.

          but if you want to talk threadverse only: feddit.de. The original kbin, fmhy, one for writers that I forgot the name…

          • Skavau@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            23 hours ago

            I do. I care very much about identity and authenticity in the Fediverse. A server that can take posts done in one group and publish as their own is as unreliable as a server who puts fake posts impersonating a popular user.

            Then we’re at an impasse. But communities becoming completely modular and movable solves the problems you speak of. That’s the answer.

            again, why you are talking about Lemmy only? Mastodon instances from all sizes go down every other week.

            Because I don’t really care or know that much about Mastodon.

            • rglullis@communick.news
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              23 hours ago

              That’s the answer.

              That’s a bad, short-sighted, wrong answer. We can have decentralized identifiers. We have more than a couple FEPs that deal with portable objects correctly, and in the last FediForum there was a lot proposed strategies to allow migrations from both dead and live servers. None of them requires a server to unilaterally steal the content from another actor and pass it as their own.

              People were criticizing me like hell because of the mirror bots on alien.top, but at least the bots were stealing from Reddit and they were meant to get people to migrate. This is implementation from PieFed may have good intentions, but the will lead to bad outcomes.

              • Skavau@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                23 hours ago

                I don’t think an admin of a server would think that if a community sets up there and operates there that they “own” it, to be honest.

                Also, currently, it would only duplicate the content and change how it appears from a Piefed instance.

                • rglullis@communick.news
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  23 hours ago

                  If you are the admin and developer of the server, you can do pretty much anything with it.

                  For example, now that I am working on an AP server, I can take all your posts on [email protected] and mirror them on [email protected]. I could also avoid sending notifications to you, so you’d be aware of this only if you visited the site directly. How would you feel about that?

                  • Skavau@piefed.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    23 hours ago

                    Well currently an admin could easily intervene and stop a migration by removing the community mods, to be fair.

                    For example, now that I am working on an AP server, I can take all your posts on [email protected] and mirror them on [email protected]. I could also avoid sending notifications to you, so you’d be aware of this only if you visited the site directly. How would you feel about that?

                    I mean you could just copy my posts anyway manually, if you were so inclined. There wouldn’t be much I could do about it no matter how you did it.