We will use Grok 3.5 (maybe we should call it 4), which has advanced reasoning, to rewrite the entire corpus of human knowledge, adding missing information and deleting errors.

Then retrain on that.

Far too much garbage in any foundation model trained on uncorrected data.

Source.

More Context

Source.

Source.

  • aaron@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Wikipedia presents the views of reliable sources on notable topics

    Absolutely nowhere near. This is why America is fucked.

    • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Again, read the rest of the comment. Wikipedia very much repeats the views of reliable sources on notable topics - most of the fuckery is in deciding what counts as “reliable” and “notable”.

      • aaron@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        And again. Read my reply. I refuted this idiotic. take.

        You allowed yourselves to be dumbed down to this point.

          • aaron@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            No. You calling me a ‘dick’ negates any point you might have had. In fact you had none. This is a personal attack.