We will use Grok 3.5 (maybe we should call it 4), which has advanced reasoning, to rewrite the entire corpus of human knowledge, adding missing information and deleting errors.

Then retrain on that.

Far too much garbage in any foundation model trained on uncorrected data.

Source.

More Context

Source.

Source.

    • breecher@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 day ago

      We have seen from his many other comments about this, that he just wants a propaganda bot that regurgitates all of the right wing talking points. So that will definitely be easier to achieve if he does it that way.

      • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        24 hours ago

        that he just wants a propaganda bot that regurgitates all of the right wing talking points.

        Then he has utterly failed with Grok. One of my new favorite pastimes is watching right wingers get angry that Grok won’t support their most obviously counterfactual bullshit and then proceed to try to argue it into saying something they can declare a win from.

    • Honytawk@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      They used to think that, but it is actually not that bad.

      Like iterations with machine learning, you can train it with optimized output.

      That isn’t the dumb part about this.