• A Wild Mimic appears!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    just to set the record straight:

    “For example, having DeepSeek R1 (70 billion parameters) answer 600,000 questions would create CO2 emissions equal to a round-trip flight from London to New York. Meanwhile, Qwen 2.5 (72 billion parameters) can answer more than three times as many questions (about 1.9 million) with similar accuracy rates while generating the same emissions.”

    i’d say that makes the average usage for personal reasons an non-issue.

    • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      That’s a good question no one else seems to be asking. When you run local prompts, you’re using more battery on your laptop or power from your PSU, but both of those are limited by their relatively small power consumption (when compared to server farms). Therefore, it could be likened to encoding heavy video or exporting complex blender models. Are you using more electricity? Yes. Is it city-eroding amounts more? Not even close.

    • BB84@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Also true: When you do 0 AI prompts, they all cause the same amount of emissions, which is 999999999 gigajoules.

  • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Yes, blame the consumers yet again when we all know corporations are the biggest climate offenders.

  • McDropout@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Lemmy wants me to believe that AI is the danger for climate change. This is like drinking through paper straw while the pollution comes from mega-factories who dump their waste in the river.

    So AI is the problem… huh… and not the thousands of missiles dropped in Ukraine, Gaza, Iran and the Occupied Terrorist Zionazi Land.

    Cool I guess, AI Bad!

    • Witziger_Waschbaer@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Shockingly, several things can be bad at the same time. What do you think will happen to places that already tend to struggle with heat (like quite a few places in the middle east), if they get even warmer? What will happen to the people that live there? Will they be able to move to colder places? Or will they simply run into borders? Borders, which are protected by more and more money and weapons (and drones controlled by AI, funny, huh?)?

      • McDropout@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Humans love to live in places that aren’t suitable for their life.

        People in some parts of Europe, Russia, North America live in places where without heating, they would simply cease to exist. Same for places in the middle east, people in Qatar and UAE live in places where without AC, they would cease to exist.

        Both ways of living is harmful for environment. Maybe we should reevaluate where we live.