• hddsx@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    I mean, yes. The advantage of fixed priced contracts over traditional cost plus contracts is that instead of Boeing twiddling their thumbs for three years wasting time trying to figure out why their original design is shit and having the government pay for it, space x is just out a rocket. Government gives 0 shits. I wonder if there penalties built in if it’s behind schedule

      • cole@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        I hate to be this guy, but this is just… not true. That’s not how this works at all. How is the government giving SpaceX money outside of a contract? They aren’t.

        Everyone wants to find a reason to hate SpaceX because Musk, but the truth is SpaceX is a well-ran innovative company.

          • cole@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            This is not evidence to the contrary, especially when the company is intentionally trying to find the limits on a development article.

            Falcon 9 (the only rocket they actually sell launches on) is one of the most reliable launch vehicles in the world.