In a Thursday speech, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) chairman Paul S. Atkins announced “Project Crypto,” an initiative to modernize the country’s securities rules and regulations to move financial markets on-chain.

“Under my leadership, the SEC will not stand idly by and watch innovations develop overseas while our capital markets remain stagnant,” he said at an America First Policy Institute event in Washington D.C. His plan includes measures to reshore crypto businesses that have left the country and to ensure that “archaic rules and regulations do not smother innovation and entrepreneurship in America.”

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    the concept of an NFT was very cool when it was first imagined

    Going to have to agree to disagree.

    It was always vaporware. A bunch of empty promises that predicted a digital monoculture. Feel like I have to carve “Ready Player One was a Dystopia!” on a baseball bat and hit people with it.

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      So I’m hearing that perhaps the idea I talked about in my example didn’t sound cool to you. But it was cool to a lot of people, and your opinion doesn’t speak for everyone. And it does work, like today.

        • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          So you really think the ability to trade digital keys is useless? That’s honestly weird.

          I mean there are so many instances of people actively using digital keys right now, so clearly that part of the functionality has value. Surely there are situations where one might want to sell access to something, and the ability to transfer a digital key with a single transaction would be useful.

          I think you’re being overly dismissive based on preconceived notions.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            So you really think the ability to trade digital keys is useless?

            When the keys cost several hundred dollars to generate? I’d say the price vastly outstrips the reward.

            I mean there are so many instances of people actively using digital keys right now

            Bailey: “Cryptocurrency is useful.”

            Moot: “Oh, so you think cryptography is useless?!”

            I think you’re being overly dismissive

            That’s fine. I don’t really value your opinion.

            • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              When the keys cost several hundred dollars to generate? I’d say the price vastly outstrips the reward.

              It does not necessarily have to cost that much… But even if it did, the key to my Honda cost a couple hundred dollars to copy, so that’s not really different.

              I don’t expect to change your mind, but it seems worth pointing out that the things you’re saying are pretty dumb.

              • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                It does not necessarily have to cost that much…

                And yet that’s the selling point behind proof-of-work cryptocurrency models. The whole reason they have value is the raw material cost to fabricate a new key.

                Absent that cost, it’s not cryptocurrency. It’s just cryptography.

                things you’re saying are pretty dumb

                Hey, good luck out there.