• lime!@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    the big thing that caused nintendo to take action against the switch emulators was that the creators were taking money for it, and explicitly pirating games. like, they set up a patreon where you could pay for early access to builds specifically tailored to games that were not released yet.

    • mesa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Theres a LOT of emulators that got caught in all that not just the ones that were taken down for legal reasons. Theres a reason quite a few new emulators are not on Github/public git sites anymore.

      Im not saying your wrong, what I am saying is that the situation is a bit nuanced and if a PSX emulator wants to push their “rights” they might find they actually dont have any when push comes to shove.

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        yeah they came down hard after someone crossed the line after looking the other way for like 30 years. i’m not surprised.

        also, playstation is like the most legally well-tread area for emulators. remember bleem?

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Yeah, but the Bleem! case set the precedent for all emulators of all consoles. The ruling doesn’t just apply to PS1.

          Bleem! was able to charge for their product as long as it didn’t include the system BIOS. They reverse engineered the emulator itself, so without BIOS or ROMS, no IP is being stolen.

          Which has become the standard operating procedure regarding emulators for decades now.