Prominent backbench MP Sarah Champion launched a campaign against VPNs previously, saying: “My new clause 54 would require the Secretary of State to publish, within six months of the Bill’s passage, a report on the effect of VPN use on Ofcom’s ability to enforce the requirements under clause 112.

"If VPNs cause significant issues, the Government must identify those issues and find solutions, rather than avoiding difficult problems.” And the Labour Party said there were “gaps” in the bill that needed to be amended.

  • arc99@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I’m intimately aware about what it can and cannot do. And it can intercept and man in the middles any https traffic

    • Glog78@digitalcourage.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      @arc99 but end 2 end encryption is not by default https traffic ;) ssh / vpn are protocolls ( end 2 end encryption, decryptio) and this firewall can’t deep inspect while this protocoll can easy tunnel other tunnels.

      • arc99@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I really do not know what you are saying. I have just told you that Fortigate Firewall can and does do deep packet inspection on https connections. It does so by man in the middle proxying. If one filter / proxy can do it then any other could too. There would be ways for kids to circumvent this, e.g via VPN but that is no different than with age verification.

        • Glog78@digitalcourage.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          @arc99

          I said (picture) your deep inspection falls short to real end 2 end. You said your firewall can break end 2 end … nope they can’t and never will and you exactly said this in your last post too. (Sidenote -> i can gpg a text and post it public even with https … for 99% it will be giberish and only the person who got the right key material will be able to read it ) … so using deep package inspection to identify something you want to protect kids from is just a lie …

          your deep inspection falls short to real end 2 end (copy of a former post in this conversation )

          • arc99@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I honestly do not know what you are saying. Deep packet inspection through a firewall that does mitm interception demonstrably happens. It is not up for debate.

            • Glog78@digitalcourage.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              @arc99 you still don’t understand end 2 end encryption. Yes man in the middle decryption can be done. First for this to happen you need to accept the certificates of the firewall ( which in terms of a home PC you can’t force anyone to do ). Second even if you can decrypt the https packets , you can still put an additional layer on top which only you and the reciever has the keys too.

              To give you an example you can easy write down a base64 encoded binary blob in any text field on a website. If this binary blob has been encrypted before noone will be able to tell what is inside.

              So breaking https is useless if someone really wants to hide informations. So no your deep packet inspection is totally useless. The only thing you know is that someone did put strange stuff in a text on a website.