• wewbull@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 months ago

    If they gained root access to the container, that’s not a moderate vulnerability. Root inside a container is still root. You can still access the kernel with root privs and it’s the same kernel as the host.

    Docker is not a virtual machine.

    • communism@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      I know that? I’m just saying that MS categorised it as such. It would be strange to include the part about MS’s responses if MS also found that the vulnerability was not what the researchers claimed it was.

      • wewbull@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        What I’m saying is something about the story doesn’t add up.

        Either Microsoft classified a major issue as a minor one so they didn’t have to payout the bug bounty (quite possible), or the attack didn’t achieve what the researchers thought it did and Microsoft classified it according to it’s actual results.

        • trolololol@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 months ago

          If I have to choose between either ms or an unknown being correct, I pick the unknown person.

    • Grappling7155@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Docker isn’t, but I was under the impression that hyperscalars tended to put all their containers in lightweight VMs or use something like kata containers anyways for security purposes

    • Fizz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think they gained root to the python env which they couldn’t do anything with because it was still running in docker inside a VM.

      • According to a smart sounding fella on hacker news.