• RedPandaRaider@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    No so does France. Proton helped convict a French environmental activist by providing the courts full access to their private proton account.

    • Vinstaal0@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Proton nor Tuta nor anybody else is above the law, you can read independant reports on the matter https://scroll.in/article/1084862/why-a-court-ban-on-encrypted-email-service-proton-mail-has-sparked-digital-privacy-fears or Proton’s own post about it https://proton.me/blog/climate-activist-arrest

      But I don’t believe that their entire account was shared with the police, but if that actually did happen and you have a proper source for it I gotta think to move my mail after all, so could you please share with the class where you read this?

      • philpo@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Tbh, it’s not the worst thing when a service does that. There are cases where it is indicated - cartels, CSAM, etc. do not deserve a safe haven. The bad part about the France issue is the fact that the Swiss court system willfully allowed a case that was not per se illegal in Switzerland and had rather controversial legal grounds in France to proceed. This is very similar to the cases where Switzerland simply ignored their own laws under pressure from the US government in terms of bank accounts 15 years earlier.

        This is rather concerning and many Swiss legal experts did not share the opinion of Proton that there was nothing Proton could have done.

      • RedPandaRaider@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        It’s not about the law, but what’s right to me.

        Proton according to this post is virtue signalling. Claiming one thing, then doing the other.

        • Vinstaal0@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 hours ago

          It is about the law, though. Proton has always been clear about the possibility that they are required to hand over data if the Swiss government requires it: https://proton.me/legal/transparency

          So IDK where you are getting that they are saying one thing and doing another thing and even more important where you got that they shared ENCRYPTED data. Cause if they have the ability to even do that I have to rethink my choose since that should be impossible if Proton did it correctly and are trustworthy.

          • RedPandaRaider@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            Proton did not only hand over data to the Swiss courts, but the French courts via that. They didn’t just comply with national laws, but those of other countries.

            That contradicts their virtue signalled interest in privacy, when they’re willing to surrender any data without even putting up a fight. They did not even try to argue in courts against handing over private data. And considering this lead to the arrest of the activist, it either obviously wasn’t encrypted or Proton had the means to decrypt it on their end.

            You can’t just link Proton’s own PR speak as a source to counter that. Of course they would defend themselves.

            • Vinstaal0@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Yes they did because most countries have some form of agreement that they share data when legally requested. It is pretty hard to bypass that, but it is duable (Mullaval VPN f.e.)

              They didn’t just surrender the data, they started collecting it at first

              The first link Ecosia showed https://archive.is/2022.04.11-095001/https://www.wired.com/story/protonmail-amends-policy-after-giving-up-activists-data/

              And let me remind you that there is a non-profit above it and they need to handle for the purpose that was created which is still Protons core businesses. They make more money just doing whats right than not because otherwise people would go back to something free or go to Tuta/Mulivad