BlueRingedOctopus@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 days agoPiracy Starter Packlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square86linkfedilinkarrow-up1322arrow-down113
arrow-up1309arrow-down1imagePiracy Starter Packlemmy.dbzer0.comBlueRingedOctopus@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square86linkfedilink
minus-squareunhrpetby@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·14 hours ago You almost had the rest of the sentence there: That doesn’t change the contradiction.
minus-squareMordikan@kbin.earthlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 hours agoYou’re trying to argue without evidence (like I had provided). To summarize these exchange so far its: You giving some marketing crap you read from a VPN provider site on their multi-hop service. Someone pointing out that it is incorrect with evidence. You get mad and basically come back with “Nuh-uh!” Is there some evidence you’d like to provide or is it going to be another “nuh-uh!”?
That doesn’t change the contradiction.
You’re trying to argue without evidence (like I had provided). To summarize these exchange so far its:
Is there some evidence you’d like to provide or is it going to be another “nuh-uh!”?