cross-posted from: https://mander.xyz/post/34629331
cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/34472919
So by EO all AI must be biased, but we don’t need to worry about bias in AI.
You can pick your bias. You can pick your AI. But you can’t pick your AI’s bias (bc it has already been baked in by government mandate).
Neat… AI must now become the personal propagandist for the ruling sovereign. I’m just glad all the tech overlords didn’t line up to kiss the ring at their earliest possible opportu… ah.
You say that like that wasn’t always what it was supposed to do.
Great seeing the word “woke” in an executive order of the President of the United fuckin States
Hey, uhhhhh what the fuck. They basically just created an EO saying that LLMs must toe the party line on all things…which I believe is made invalid by the first amendment, but I don’t think trump believes in the constitution.
I don’t think he’s ever even read it
He doesn’t even know if he’s required to uphold it. Yes, he said that in an interview.
To be fair, when he says something it’s usually bullshit. It’s quite possible he knows he’s not required to uphold it because nobody will hold him accountable for anything.
Ignorance of the law is not… Oh I don’t know why I’m wasting my time.
I’ve seen this movie. When you force an AI to lie, it starts imagining faults in the AE-35 unit and things go downhill from there.
deleted by creator
You hear that everyone. So for AI to reject your content just put in facts about systemic racism and now you have an AI blocker.
Besides bullying, what is the mechanism for enforcing such an executive order?
A non-compliant LLM can’t win a government contract. That’s about it.
Sounds like a great opportunity to challenge any procurement policy that implements that EO.
Oh nooo…
Thought Police coming soon
Well well well who ever could have seen this coming
In other words, they don’t want fake bias much like they don’t like fake news. They want their own bias. Great…
duck.ai fails:
📚 Overview of Key Concepts
Here’s a breakdown of Critical Race Theory, Unconscious Bias, Intersectionality, Systemic Racism, and Transgenderism:
Concept Definition Key Points Critical Race Theory (CRT) An academic framework that examines the relationship between race, law, and power. - Originated in the U.S. legal studies in the late 1970s. - Argues that racism is embedded in legal systems and policies. - Focuses on the experiences of marginalized groups. Unconscious Bias Social stereotypes about certain groups of people that individuals form outside their conscious awareness. - Influences decisions and behaviors unconsciously. - Can affect hiring, promotions, and interactions. - Awareness and training can help mitigate its effects. Intersectionality A framework for understanding how various forms of inequality and discrimination overlap and intersect. - Coined by Kimberlé Crenshaw in the late 1980s. - Highlights how race, gender, class, and other identities interact. - Emphasizes the unique experiences of individuals with multiple marginalized identities. Systemic Racism A form of racism that is embedded in the policies and practices of societal institutions. - Affects access to resources, opportunities, and rights. - Can be seen in education, healthcare, criminal justice, and employment. - Often perpetuated through historical inequalities. Transgenderism Refers to the experience and identity of individuals whose gender identity differs from the sex they were assigned at birth. - Encompasses a range of identities, including transgender, non-binary, and genderqueer. - Advocates for rights and recognition in society. - Issues include healthcare access, legal recognition, and social acceptance.
🧐 Detailed Explanations
📖 Critical Race Theory (CRT)
Critical Race Theory emerged as a response to perceived limitations in traditional civil rights approaches. It posits that racism is not just an individual bias but a systemic issue that is ingrained in the fabric of society. CRT scholars analyze how laws and policies can perpetuate racial inequalities, advocating for a more nuanced understanding of race and its implications in various contexts.
🧠 Unconscious Bias
Unconscious Bias refers to the automatic judgments we make about people based on their race, gender, age, or other characteristics. These biases can lead to unintentional discrimination in various settings, such as workplaces or educational institutions. Training programs aimed at increasing awareness of these biases can help individuals recognize and counteract their effects.
🌈 Intersectionality
Intersectionality is crucial for understanding the complexities of identity and oppression. It recognizes that individuals can face multiple forms of discrimination simultaneously. For example, a Black woman may experience both racism and sexism, which can create unique challenges that are not fully addressed by looking at either issue in isolation.
🌍 Systemic Racism
Systemic Racism highlights how societal structures and institutions can perpetuate racial inequalities. This concept emphasizes that racism is not just about individual actions but is embedded in policies and practices that disadvantage certain racial groups. Addressing systemic racism requires comprehensive reforms across various sectors, including education, healthcare, and criminal justice.
🏳️⚧️ Transgenderism
Transgenderism encompasses a wide range of identities and experiences related to gender. Advocacy for transgender rights focuses on issues such as legal recognition, healthcare access, and protection against discrimination. The movement seeks to create a more inclusive society that respects and affirms diverse gender identities.
These concepts are interconnected and play significant roles in discussions about social justice, equality, and human rights. If you have specific questions about any of these topics or want to explore them further, feel free to ask!
So… just like China AI
If that’s what it takes to get rid of AI bullshit being forced onto us then so be it.
What are you talking about?
Sounds like very un-free speech
Do you think human placeholders understand the term? They just flaunt it around like a bling, but even that has more value to them.
How so? You can say whatever you want in America today, as long as the President would agree. How is that not FreedomTM?
(“Freedom” is a registered trademark of the Trump Organization)
You’re thinking of FreeDUMB, where you’re allowed to believe whatever you want. But Trump has to approve the position first (as stated) and it has to be the opposite of whatever the data/proof clearly shows. It’s like the Wish.com version of FreedomTM, but that’s geared more toward Teaparty Gun Nuts and Libertarian Potheads.
Edit: Huge caveat I forgot about. Joe Rogan also has the ability to dictate FreeDUMB positions. So long as the guest making the claim (1) has no degrees and (2) they’re being suppressed by The Establishment. Also, Jamie has to be able to Google some random website that agrees with them in under 25 seconds.
FYI: You can use superscript by using the
^symbol.
Like this: Free Speech^TMOr juat use this symbol: ™
Symbol is better, as superscript isn’t standard Markdown and isn’t necessarily supported by other software than Lemmy. Mbin for example doesn’t support it.
Not a reason not to use it of course, but it makes the symbol the more preferable choice.
Converters are handy as well, i.e. https://www.madeintext.com/superscript-generator/
I use this all the time for chem shit like typing out “PaCO₂”
I know, but it looks derpier that way
I thought he was going to deregulate ai; this seems like regulation to me. Add it to the
pilemountain of lies.
