• FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’ve never seen anyone advertising an LLM as being good at spelling bees. The only time I ever see this spelling thing come up is when people are making fun of it.

      • yuri@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        they’re presented as general knowledge chatbots at the very least, and i know i’d consider spelling pretty general knowledge.

        the way i see it you can either acknowledge the “strawberry question” as a genuine failing of most every publicly accessible LLM, or you can acknowledge that LLMs are only ever actually correct by pure chance. sometimes it’s a REALLY GOOD chance, but at the end of the day it’s still always a variable that you can’t actually control.

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          You see a false dichotomy.

          I see someone pounding away at a ball of yarn with a hammer and complaining that it’s not as good a knitting implement as they imagined.

          • yuri@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            in this thread i’ve only seen complaints about the implementation, no one has even implied LLM’s are useless.

            • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              tbh people call them useless all the time but they also cherry pick their weakness.

              it is a tool, it has utility. kinda like crypto although grifters seem to always soil promising tech. but in 20 years it will all settle and we will be enslaved, anyways.