• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    What kind of revisionist bullshit is this?

    Like, it’s almost always safe to write off anyone using “normies” but do you think 2002 was like in movies/TV?

    “The net” wasn’t some secret thing, kids had been using it in school for over a decade.

    I can’t tell if you weren’t born then or already 50 years old…

    But wherever you’re getting your opinions on 2002 internet, it wasn’t first hand

    • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      3 days ago

      As a 50-something, I can see the case for putting the “golden age” of the internet between the birth of Wikipedia in 2001 and Facebook in 2006.

      • jaybone@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’d expand it a bit further. Maybe 1999 to 2009. While Facebook did exist towards the end there, everyone’s grandmother wasn’t on it yet and they weren’t entirely intrusive and walled gardened. Forums still existed. Search engines still returned good results.
        But it was the beginning of what would come. After 2009 it went downhill fast.

    • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s just nostalgia applied to the internet. Some people call it Eternal September. Everyone prefers what the internet was when they first discovered it and hate what it’s become since then. I remember the internet from 1996 most fondly. Many prefer it from the 80s or earlier 90s. This is no different from other media: music, TV, movies.

      Of course this is separate from the real issue which is the consolidation and silo-ification of the modern web.

      • Balder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Yeah, the best is never going to be “now”, which is always drown in uncertainty and chaos. When you look back, everything looks safe and deterministic.

    • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Punch the Monkey, Shake the Tree, Bonzi Buddy, flash animation, sites that only worked in IE, etc, etc.

      You’re right, anyone who thinks 2002 was some golden age of the internet clearly wasn’t there.

    • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      As what was said below, it was kind of a golden age. It was usable by normal people but still pretty novel to most. And it was a while before corporations ruined it. I lived through it so I can confirm it was better in most ways, besides speeds. I should say, 05 would be a better choice.