Yes, burying fertilizer traps biomass CO2 and then they can use that as carbon credit equivalent to claim CO² neutrality.
Of course, there’s a reason why fertilizer is an inexpensive source of fixated carbon biomass and
this means all fertilizer will increase in price by the amount value of it’s CO2 carbon credit equivalent
Then maybe the buried fertilizer will become so valuable that it can be dug out and sold as fertilizer again.
Yes, burying fertilizer traps biomass CO2 and then they can use that as carbon credit equivalent to claim CO² neutrality.
Of course, there’s a reason why fertilizer is an inexpensive source of fixated carbon biomass and this means all fertilizer will increase in price by the amount value of it’s CO2 carbon credit equivalent
Then maybe the buried fertilizer will become so valuable that it can be dug out and sold as fertilizer again.
I don’t see any problems with this plan !
Between the methane that generates and easily obtained phosphorous trapped down there, that’s strictly a matter of time, unfortunately.
except the part the planet may be uninhabitable for humans by then due to the massive CO2 we are spewing to get slop from AI…
other than that, no problem at all
Sure, sure but !
“Yes, the planet got destroyed. But for a beautiful moment in time we created a lot of value for shareholders.”